So, in case anyone was curious, I posted [HERE](https://www.reddit.com/r/petinsurancereviews/comments/1io7ggn/fetch_pet_insurance_prescription_sublimit/) and [HERE](https://www.reddit.com/r/petinsurancereviews/comments/1j4f71u/update_fetch_pet_insurance_deceitful_enrollment/) about an ongoing issue with Fetch Pet Insurance about a "prescription sub-limit" applied to Virginia, USA policies and wanted to give the final update as far as I am aware. TLDR: Fetch pet is rolling out a "prescription sub-limit" of 1500 dollars on all applicable policies, that applies to any and all medications (including ones given in hospital and during surgery). This sub-limit was not disclosed to me nor does it exist on any of their publicly available documentation. My dog had surgery in January and a portion of it wasn't covered because they applied all of the medications used in that surgery to the sub-limit, and I was informed that for the rest of the year no medications would be covered due to this sub-limit. I made a report to the BBB and contacted my states insurance board to see if this sub-limit was appropriately filed with them. Haven't heard back about the BBB complaint but my state's insurance office did confirm that Fetch filed the sub-limit with the state. I have no idea what other states this is applicable in, because there's still no information about it on their site, probably because they don't want people to know about the bottlenecking they are applying to policies. After quite a bit of back and forth, I've been informed that my and several other individuals who had surgeries are having those claims reassessed and that surgical medications will not be imposed against the sub-limit. They are adjusting the under-writing language to specifically change how they assess anesthetic drugs, but all other medications (nerve blocks, pain management in surgery, and antibiotics given in surgery) will still be applied to the sub-limit. With my reassessment, I received the remaining balance I was owed from my dog's surgery and now have about 850 dollars left in my prescription sub-limit for the year. I'm still quite a bit miffed that they were able to apply such a restrictive sub-limit to my policy without informing me, and this sub-limit is still applicable to medications given by veterinarians in-hospital, but at the very least they are not applying anesthetic medications to this sub-limit any longer. If you had a surgery only partially covered by Fetch Pet Insurance in the past year due to complications surrounding this sub-limit. Please submit an appeal, I've been told (on a recorded line) that they are reassessing any surgical claims made using the previous underwriting language surrounding this policy.

Hi, I’m new to this sub. My husband got brinks security system before we got married, few months ago I was going through our monthly budgets and saw $65 for brinks subscription for the cameras barely working and not recording anything when something important happened. For example somebody broke in to my husband’s car and camera didn’t record then I called them and they asked $1500 for cancellation because it’s 5 years contract.. I hung up and was planning to take it to small claim court but some other major life events happened and I didn’t think about it until yesterday when somebody hit my husband’s car in front of our house where the camera supposed to record but it didn’t.. I’m so mad and want to get rid of entire system from our house and don’t want to have any legal attachment to them anymore. How can I do that without paying $1500? Would small claim court fix this? I’m willing spend few hundreds if needed. Location: Augusta, Georgia Thank you in advance to all of you.

I was rear ended last week while driving my 16-day old 2025 Subaru Outback Premium. The other driver was in a Hertz rental vehicle and his car was 'insured' with his Chase Business Ink Preferred card but that does not include liability insurance, and he does not have personal car insurance otherwise, so he does not have any insurance to cover the damage to my vehicle. He apparently lives fulltime in Israel although I think he is also a New Jersey resident. It is not clear to me how he could legally be driving a rental vehicle without liability insurance or how Hertz rented him a car without it but that is more of a side note since regardless of the circumstances he does not have liability insurance. I spoke with my insurance company, Geico, and they are directing me to go get my car fixed, to pay the deductible, and that they will confirm he is not insured and then pursue him personally through collections if needed. I am still waiting for the Geico coverage team to reach out to me since they apparently want to confirm this isn't a fraudulent claim as the vehicle and insurance are brand new so I am waiting to get the car repaired in the meantime. I did visit the Subaru mechanic earlier in the week and they thought that in addition to replacing the back bumper there is likely damage to the frame based on a visual inspection. Of course, they won't know anything for sure until they open the car up and look. They recommended that I make a claim for Diminished Value since the car is certainly worth a lot less than it was a couple days prior- I haven't even made my first payment on the $35k loan. I asked Geico about a Diminished Value claim but they told me that the claim needs to be filed against the other driver's insurance and that basically it doesn't have anything to do with them. I do have $250k of Uninsured Motorist Bodily Injury/Supplementary Uninsured Motorist but apparently that doesn't do me any good (my car and insurance are New York). I have been in contact by text message with the other driver but I'm highly skeptical that he would pay me thousands of dollars out of pocket on top of the other liability that he has since his proposal to me was that I run this all through my insurance and he sends me $500 for the deductible "to make me whole". What are my options moving forward? Do I engage an assessor after the repairs are complete so that I have a record of the diminished value? Maybe it's better that I get a lawyer who has experience with this and can manage the court process for me since this will almost definitely go to small claims court?

Two weeks ago, I got rear-ended by a commercial truck owned by a logistics company, X. I originally filed the claim through their insurance company, Y (as listed on the driver information exchange). A few days later, insurance company Y told me that company X would cover the accident and gave me a claim number with X. I can only get in touch with X by email (which has very slow correspondence), and their phone line is always busy. After I sent them all the information they requested, the only response I got was that they are "reviewing" the case and will discuss it after that—without mentioning how long it will take. Since they are not an insurance company, I assume they don’t handle claims in the standard way. Now it's been more than two weeks, and I still have no idea how they plan to address this. Are there any legal requirements for how soon they need to respond and resolve the issue? (I do not want to go through my own insurance and pay out of pocket.) What actions can I take to push them to make progress on this? Any suggestions or advice would be greatly appreciated!!!!

I went to a urology visit at UIC in Chicago. The whole visit was around 10 minutes, no longer, since I was called in: blood pressure and oxigen check, a few questions about my health history and then came in the doctore that in two minutes, without even using special pieces of equipment, gave me the diagnosis. Only few weeks ago I recevied the bill and surprisingly I was billed twice: one bill for the doctor service and one for the use of the infastructure tislef. Basically the doctor just "rent" the room and equipment and provides the service. For the first bill, the total was covered by insurance excpet a small co-payment ($40), but the second one is covered only partly . It was $460 and after reductions, I have to pay out pocket, 250$. The code associated with this item is 99204: "New patient office or other outpatient visit, 45-59 minutes, Level 4" (https://www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/cpt/cpt-code-99204-new-patient-office-visit-45-59-minutes#:\~:text=Additional%20CPT%20resources-,CPT%C2%AE%20code%2099204%3A%20New%20patient%20office%20or,outpatient%20visit%2C%2045%2D59%20minutes) If you read thorugh the link above, this code should be applied when: "Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of a new patient, which requires a medically appropriate history and/or examination and moderate level of medical decision making. When using time for code selection, 45-59 minutes of total time is spent on the date of the encounter." Basically, none of these createria were met. Even if I descalate to Level 3, it still require 30-44 minutes and a thoroughly examination of past and current conditions. Now, what actions would you suggest me to do? Trying to reason with the hospital itslef or can BCBS help me with this matter? Fortunately, I can afford to pay this bill. But it is just frustating that it's literally a mafia, a scheme out there, and nobody does nothing. I can't imagine the people living paycheck by payecheck and being frauded by private health.

Has anybody been able to buy one or get a quote. I am trying and while insurance companies website mention they exist - I am not able to get a quote and the call center agents are equally clueless. Edit - Geico Licensed Insurance Agent said that they are not issuing any NNO (Named Non Owner) Policy currently. So lets see how easy it is to get one.

Well, I guess im late to finding out my coverage dropped from 90% to 50% i had been doing claims due to my dog having multiple TPLO surgeries and find out ny nost recent one only got covered 50%. Pretty annoyed. My dog is 8 and already is through most of the surgeries but does have a neurological issue. Im looking to get a new policy somewhere and would love recommendations.

like many others, I was just hit with a huge increase - more than double - for Healthy Paws. we do have pretty significant monthly spend (thank youuu environmental allergies), so I wasn't likely to cancel completely, but I decided to run all the options for 90%, 80%, and 70% coverage through chat gpt, including my set monthly vet expenses. it gave me a detailed explanation for why insurance is still a good idea for me, and which option specifically would save me the most money. for my scenario, it ended up being 80% at $1000 deductible. just a suggestion in case youre not sure what your next step should be.

I live and work in California for reference. I left my job to seek treatment for substance use disorder and Kaiser is claiming that they cannot excuse me since I did not participate in their outpatient program. I met with a doctor every week and he prescribed me medication to detox at home from fentanyl and methamphetamine. However they claim that this is not considered to be under a doctor's care and will not sign documentation for those dates. Over the course of 28 days I detoxed three times and relapsed three times before they sent me to a third party inpatient program. I am new to the Kaiser program as of this year and they recommended I go through their detox at home and outpatient program instead of directly to inpatient in spite of my long history of substance abuse and my multiple stays at detox facilities and residential facilities. Currently I am unprotected for these 28 days but I am wondering if this is legal?

I have a 2015 Toyota RAV4 and I still owe 12,000 on the vehicle, Just got it last year. with that being said I was in an accident on 3/6 and their insurance company wants to claim the vehicle as a total loss... my question is what if they don't give me enough to cover the loan? I am pretty stressed because the accident was not my fault at all. it is going to liberty mutual does anyone have any idea?