My Aetna plan will be removing Miebo from coverage in the new plan year effective 7/1/25. This drug is the only FDA approved drug proven to treat the evaporative component of dry eye disease. There recommending I switch to Restasis , which is a good drug, but only treats the production of tears and not evaporation. Since there is no generic and no FDA approved alternative , are there any legal actions I can consider, or the plan can just do whatever they want and I’ll need to find another company that will cover the plan. The drug is about $800 a month, and while I can make it work, I would prefer for it to be paid for. I could also attempt to back door the European Version EVOTEARS from Germany for $20 a bottle.

1. In October 2024,I bought a I Phone 16 max pro from T Mobile store for some other person as he didn’t have address documents and mail ID. I gave my documents for mailing address, mail ID and alternate contact number at T-Mobile store. 2. T- Mobile sold the I phone with a sim and monthly plan of $95. The other person didn’t pay $95 for the recharge after October. He kept using the phone on his home WiFi as the sim was active but with no service. 3. In March 2025 a 3rd party, not T- Mobile sends me an outstanding bill of $588.33 on the T-Mobile plan I took in October. 4. Now my issue is why didn’t T-Mobile inform me through my address Mail or my mail ID or through the alternate contact number that my plan was not being recharged and I am collecting an outstanding. Why a third party is sending a mail on my address to collect outstanding dues on T-Mobile plan. In between I was getting call from the 3rd party that I have an outstanding, I went to the T-Mobile store and asked should I entertain such calls they said it is spam, do not entertain these calls. 5. How should I go about clearing this Issue can anybody advise me on the steps to be taken. It’s concerning as $588.33 is not a small amount.Thank you all.

I am 20 years old and on my parents insurance. I got prescribed a medication under the impression that they would not be notified but my dad got a call about the prior authorization being approved and also a letter in the mail. Does anyone know how to change this/prevent this happening again in the future?

I’m in shambles. A surgery out of network I was approved actually late last year is somehow now denied in network now? And the record of approval is nowhere to be found?? Literally saw it three weeks ago. I want to make sure this appeal hits the ball out of the park with all necessary info but it’s such an uphill mountain and I was so happy for a month and a half excitedly waiting for my surgery next month. Please help.

I managed two older buildings one built in 1950 and one built in 1900. The company's own them for 13 years and never had a insurance claim. Country financial, which is owned by Farmers I believe, did a risk analysis is dropping 45% of their older homes Are there any companies out there that are easier to cover older rental properties with older rust but still in good condition?

Our puppy went to a few puppy socials in the past week. Today he started having a loud dry cough, so we took him to the vet. The vet diagnosed him with a minor respiratory illness. The vet wasn’t concerned because he was still eating well and had no change in energy level, but still prescribed him some cough suppressant. We mistakenly filed a claim to Trupanion at the vet to try to cover the medication. However, we were on day 28 of the 30 day waiting period and Trupanion denied the claim. Furthermore, Trupanion now saying that “cough” is a pre-existing condition and we will no longer be able to submit any claims for “cough” in the future. I saw that some insurance providers delineate between curable and non-curable pre-existing conditions. Does anyone know if Trupanion does this? Additionally, is there any way to get the “cough” removed as a pre-existing condition from Trupanion or are we screwed? Thank you!

I’m moving to a new state and currently have renters’ insurance with State Farm. I filed a claim for a theft in my building a couple of months ago, where a large amount of my personal items were stolen from what was supposed to be a secure mailroom. Last Friday, I contacted a State Farm agent in my new state to set up a policy for my next apartment. After taking the weekend to get back to me, she said she had spoken with the underwriting department and they couldn’t write me a policy because of that claim. She specifically said I couldn’t have an active claim in the last **24–36 months**. That doesn’t make sense to me. Why would the rule be a range instead of a clear cutoff? Is this standard insurance practice, and I’m just unfamiliar with it, or did she give me incorrect info? The vague timeline feels odd, and I’m wondering if she was just making it up or if she has the information wrong. I ended up going with a different insurance company anyway, but just wondering if she was BSing

I've posted about my claim before. Insurance company low balled me on the settlement for my stolen car. Offered me 23k total I didn't agree, they didn't want to negotiate and told me to invoke appraisal clause. They rep calls we over a week later and told me good news their appraiser came up with 26k and something. Told me I don't have to get an appraiser anymore. Sounded good to me. Next day I get a call, they made a mistake and weren't supposed to tell me that amount since that's the amount their appraiser came up with for when I actually invoke the appraisal clause. I'm confused so I have two questions: Can they legally backtrack like that after they already told me I didn't have to get an appraiser and the amount they were at? And also, technically if I get an appraiser he or she should be able to get me more than their estimate right?

Hi everyone, I'm on the phone with the claims department at MetLife. After having paid faithfully for my dog's insurance since the night I adopted him for two years, when I finally filed my claims, I've received SIXTEEN CENTS. Two years worth of payments for SIXTEEN CENTS. They are denying part of my claim because they said I need to provide the previous 12 months of medical records of my dog's history before November 2022. The problem? I ADOPTED HIM IN NOVEMBER 2022. I could see if they were confused about that, but they were on the phone with me during the adoption process! I have a second dog, and I have a different insurance through them, and I planned on going with them, but MetLife gave me a good rate, and the rescue was so encouraging that I went with them, against my better judgment. Now I know why- they suck. I am looking for other people who've been asked for the same asinine requirements of producing their adopted dog's previous 12 months of SOAP notes BEFORE you adopted them and were denied for a claim. I'm looking to either send this to my state's AG or see if there's an attorney out there willing to take on a class action. Clearly, MetLife Pet insurance is a scam agency. I've asked them yet again to reimburse me, and I told them this time, if they say no, then I want all my payments returned. It's an easy decision- pay less for my claim, or pay more and give me back all my money. I also told them if they do, I'm willing to return the 16 cent paper check I made them mail me. Thanks.

So I’m (M22) new to all this Pet Insurance jazz. I just recently moved to my own apartment from my mom’s house, so I moved my cats pet insurance to my new address just so it’s easier and have a sense of independence. When I called MetLife to switch my address, the representative said NOTHING until the very end about me having to pay my deductible AGAIN and I would also be charged ANOTHER payment for my cat’s insurance as it would be getting restarted. I just wanna know if this is true or if I gotta make a phone call?