So recently someone backed into me at the parking lot and damaged the front of my car. We exchanged information etc and the person initially was thinking to settle it without involving insurance. I was fine with this and reached out to a few places, but most say it is hard to determine the total damage without doing a full diagnostics because there are many sensors/cameras/lights in that area. Only 1 place gave me a preliminary estimate after looking at the damage. We then decided to get insurance involved. His insurance assumed full liability and send out a person to estimate the damage visually. The estimate is quite low, lower than the place who gave me an estimate directly. They said I would need to take my car to a shop that is willing to work with their rate. If additional damage is determined, then the shop would work with the insurance company for any additional costs. During this whole process, I feel like the other person's insurance treats me like I am trying to scam them. I asked what if the shop dong want to fix the car because the insurance estimate is too low, and they said that I would have to pay for the different if the shop is not willing to work with their rate. So now I am wondering if it makes sense if I reach out to my insurance company and report this incident, would they deal with the other person's insurance instead of me dealing with it directly? Thank you.

I got an email for my claim today saying my cat showed signs for diabetes at her exam in sept (I posted a pic of the exam notes on left and the email from embrace today on right). I don’t see anywhere it says she had diabetes. She was throwing up, but vet never said she showed signs of diabetes. My cat became diabetic late Jan, early Feb and is already in remission. Should I fight this (get a note from the vet)? Has anyone heard of successful stories?

I had to file a claim with my automobile insurance company due to 4k worth of damage to my vehicle when I hit a MASSIVE pothole. The pothole looked more like a huge chunk of cement that got wedged out of the lane, possibly by a snowplow. It was the tail end of a decent snowstorm and this hole was unavoidable. Why? I was surrounded by vehicles and to swerve either way or stop short would have resulted in something far worse. I attempted to straddle the hole but it was too wide. After having my interview with my claims examiner she told me she felt strongly that she could get her boss to sign off on my claim as a no fault. she called bck and told me it wa an at fault and wouldn't budge. She read me the typical language that I should be aware of my surroundings and more cognizant as to the road conditions before me. The conversation went nowhere. They paid the claim at least. My question: how could they call it at fault given the circumstances? They made this decision without ever even seeing a picture of the pothole, which proves its width? I am now trying to get the item removed via lexis/nexis. How much might this save me if it were remove?

I have a 2025 Toyota Camry with 14,000 miles. It got covered with a coating of cement. The insurance company offered me $3,700. My Toyota dealership has said they will take the car plus $5,500 and give me a new 2025 Toyota Camry. Is there any way to negotiate with my insurance company for the additional $1,800? The body shops are coming back saying it's going to cost between $5000 and $8,000 to fix. That doesn't include diminished value which I could file after it's fixed. It seems to me that offering the insurance company $5,500 to close this claim forever is a really good deal for the insurance company because they will almost certainly spend more if I get the car fixed. Any advice on how to get the insurance company to agree? I'm buying the new car regardless. It's being shipped in and I'm picking it up Thursday. Edit to add: my insurance company will have to subrogate with the contractors insurance company. The contractor is 100% at fault.

So…I’ve had Nationwide for my Yorkie since I got him. For five years. They paid 90% which I think is exceptional. In fact, they’ve stopped that practice! He’s had pancreatitis twice, allergies and other expensive issues. Today I received a notice I was being cancelled. I feared it as the bills have been very high. My question is…Now What?? What recommendations do you have? Will a new company accept pre existing conditions? Who pays out the best and the fastest? I appreciate all thoughts! TIA

I have 3 vehicles under my name, we were in the middle of moving between cities and I decided to change the location. Due to last minute changes, we decided to stay at our current location. I went to log back into geico to change it back and it says they locked my account and when I called them they said “they are investigating the location of the vehicles”. What are my options now and what should I do?

I’ve had my two dogs insured with Healthy Paws for almost a decade, and at first, it seemed like a great choice, claims were really easy, they seemed like they cared by sending good will messages after a claim etc. Monthly premiums started at around $30–$40 per pet, then slowly crept up—$50, $70, $90. It was annoying but manageable, thought it was normal as dogs aged and there was also inflation. Then, things went off the rails, I think it's because they were acquired by a bigger company (that's my speculation tho). My premium was already high at around \~$250/month for both dogs, but now they want **\~$550/month**— more than double overnight! No new benefits, no explanation, just pure corporate greed. It’s clear they’re taking advantage of longtime customers with older pets, knowing we have fewer options due to pre-existing conditions. It’s a disgusting, predatory practice. They assume people won’t leave, but I’d rather pay another company—even if it costs more—than reward this behavior. **I'd say avoid Healthy Paws at all costs.** Also if anybody had changed insurances at a similar point and were happy after please let me know!

My dog just turned 8 and her insurance with pets best doubled. Where im at financially is not great, im just able to get by with my exisiting bills, part of why i have pet in isurance, for the chance something terrible happens like a broken tooth or torn tendon or whatever may happen. Shes healthy. Has allergies but theyre not on her med record as far as i know. I just am trying ti debate if i should set the money aside each month for an emergency fund for her, rather than pay the insurance fee. My fear is something qill happen before i have a good savings, though i usually try to have $1000 emegency money for pet or car stuff, im not quite there yet atm. I have decent credit so if something happe ef im sure i can do a payment plan of some sort. Idk im just wondering if its worth it anymore at the price theyre expecting. My 3 yo dog is clumsy as hell so im keeping his insurance. I just know theres going to be a day he falls the wrong way and tears a tendon or something hahaha! Any advice is really welcome, im just so broke these days and i really want to find the best option that ensures my pup can get the treatment she may need in an emergency.

I have been a State Farm customer for almost 40 years. I recently was in my first serious automobile accident where the repair costs are around $25,000. State Farm has been hellish to work with and dragged even just the start of repairs out two months. It’s not over yet, but it’s pretty clear I’m gonna end up having to pay a pretty good chunk of that out-of-pocket. The body shop tells me that most namebrand insurance companies are difficult to work with. He suggested one of the high-end brands like Chubb or Pure. The more I think about it it seems like I could go with a low rate company and for that once every 25 year incident just pay for the repairs myself. As long as I have injuries and liability covered, it feels like I would come out even. My question is this. Should I go with a different company that is more white glove service like Chubb? Or should I find some cut rate company where I at least know up front I’m going to have to pay out-of-pocket for an repairs like this but save money and headache in the long run? Or should I just stay in the middle with SF? FYI, I do have good umbrella coverage too.

I made a claim via triple a and they stated I was at fault for the following: Tire debris was flowing through various freeway lanes. It was not safe for me to merge on to the lane to my left because it was flooded, and to my right there were other vehicles that would not have permitted me to merge in time to avoid the popped tire debris. I stayed in the lane I was an and the debris struck my vehicle, causing damage to the front bumper and fender. They stated I am at fault because I “struck the debris and could have avoided it.” Is there anything I can quote from their comprehensive coverage to not be labeled as at fault? Or am I at fault?