I posted here a couple days ago about a stolen motorcycle (thank you all for reminding me not to commit fraud) and I called Geico about some questions I had. The told me I could get the collision and comprehensive policy right now, after the theft, and if the person who stole my motorcycle gets into a crash with a stationary object or another car and the motorcyclist is at fault I could be compensated. I got qouted for the coverage and it's $4,717.62! I paid $791.07 originally and the new total will be $5,508.69. I'm assuming since this policy covers the vehicle its more but $4,717.62 is absolutely crazy. I don't think I will be getting the policy at this point because of the depreciation on the bike makes it worth around $8,000 and the insurance would be almost half what the bike is worth. Even at rates of a new rider that seems fairly high. I apologize for the rant, QUESTION: Is this a normal quote for the policy on a motorcycle or is that something because I am a new rider?

So I have had AmFam insurance through Costco (live in Wisconsin) for a couple of yrs which comes with with a few perks that I thought would be helpful; non-deductible coverage for 1k to fix a window and $100 for locksmith if you get locked out. Well, in the span of 6 months I ended up using both of these but didn't know they get filled as claims against my insurance. Fast forward 6 months, and I just a notice of Non-Renewal because I have had 3 claims in the last 3yrs (I've a claim bcuz of lost baggage 3yrs ago). I'm calling around and getting a lot of refusals and getting a bit scared that I won't find coverage for the house. I tried appealing the decision but that didn't work either Is there any way I can drop these AmFam claims? Or known companies that would still cover here?

Hi all, I recently moved, got a new gastroenterologist, and switched to Blue Cross Blue Shield insurance. I specifically went to the new doctor to get a prescription for Viberzi for my IBS. I've been on this medication for four years and knew the new insurance would require prior authorization. Long story short, my prior authorization was denied because the insurance company said my medical history wasn’t documented. I was confused since I had already submitted my past medical records to the new doctor. When I called the office to check, they told me they *can’t* include previous medical records because they were from before I became a patient there. They said they are going to submit it again and it will go to a peer-to-peer next. And I asked if the doctor will submit my medical history then. And they told me "He doesn't need to send your medical history. He's a physician." I’m really frustrated and not sure what to do next besides hoping the peer-to-peer thing works. Has anyone dealt with something similar? Can a doctor really not use past medical records for prior authorization? Any advice?

Seeking advice. I had an accident very recently where the other car hit my car while doing improper lane change. Even the police said by seeing the dash cam video of my car that the other person was at fault, I called my insurance company in order to report the accident but they filed it as a claim without confirming with me first. Even though I told them I don't want to use my collision coverage as the accident was not my fault, they still filed a claim without confirming with me first. The claim was closed next day without any pay as they suggested to contact the other person's insurance because I am not at fault. Now I am afraid that this claim will increase my insurance rate from now on, what should I do now? How much it might increase? Is there any way to remove it from the record? Any kind of suggestions will be appreciated.

Okay so I have a new vehicle, and I decided to use Root Insurance. Usually the insurance websites automatically add comprehensive and collision when you state it's financed. So I thought it had. Anyway, it was liability only. Now last week there was a hailstorm and it did some damage to the car. Not hardcore but it js noticeable up close. What can I do? All I can do is fix it right with my own money? Will the bank go after me? I'm just so lost right now any advice would be appreciated.

My home insurance policy was up for renewal last October, and I ended up switching from Intact to RBC because the premium was lower. About a month later, I got a message saying that they wanted to do an inspection of my home. The inspector came and took some photos and told me that everything looked good and there shouldn’t be any major issues. Today, I received a registered letter telling me that my policy will be cancelled in 30 days due to “underwriting reasons”. I was unable to speak to anyone at RBC before they closed for the day, and will call first thing in the morning. I have no idea why they would cancel my policy. I’ve been continuously insured for over 10 years, have never missed a payment and didn’t withhold any information when I got my quote. I have had 2 claims in the past, but the last one was in 2016 so I didn’t declare it during the application because they asked if I had made any claims in the last 6 years. Has anyone had this happen before? I’m freaking out a bit because I understand that if you have an insurance policy cancelled on you it becomes harder to get insurance in the future. Any help or advice would be greatly appreciated, thanks!

Long story short, I got a bcbs plan through the marketplace last month and I kept getting bills for $0.00 saying I needed to pay or my policy would be canceled. The first time I got a bill for that amount I went online and paid a penny. Then I got another bill for the same amount of $0.00. I figured it was nothing to worry about. Fast forward to today, I have a doctors appointment tomorrow, and I get hit with an email saying my policy with bcbs has been terminated due to non-payment. Non-payment of what? Nothing? Why?

26, California, $37,000. My health insurance provider denied me access to estradiol for the purpose of gender transition (MtF). I was prescribed this by my doctor and they called me to inform me that my insurance excludes anything under gender related health care according to a denial letter they got from the company. Blue Cross Blue Shield Kansas City provides the health care in Missouri because of the company being nationwide, although I am based in California. I have yet to receive a copy of the denial letter myself, but plan to get a copy of the one from my doctor's office if I don't receive one in the mail this following week from the company. According to the BCBSKS website they do cover gender transition and when I started this job I asked them if it was covered. My H.R. representative seemed confused about the denial and said she'd look into it as she'd never run into this before. She also that they supposedly cover gender related surgery at a certain percentage so something seems fishy. Is this a recent policy change? What are my options? I'm currently filing a complaint through my recently formed union at the company and will be using GoodRx to be able to afford it, but now I'm worried if I tried to receive anything else transition related and am frustrated it won't go towards a deductible. I don't have the letter of denial yet. Will I be able to appeal with information on the letter? Is this legal since I am a California resident or is it all purely through Missouri laws? Just looking for advice.

I'm thinking of changing my renter's insurance of 8 years Assurant (Actually did some research and did not hear good things about them) to bundle with USAA. My apartment company has an "insurance fee" as part of the lease which covers liability, so all I would need is coverage for property. Since liability is now part of the lease, I was thinking of dropping liability from renter's policy to save some money. Is there any reason why I should keep liability on my renter's policy that I can't think of?

My girlfriend received a collection letter last month about an outstanding AllState Insurance bill she does not believe she owes. Following my advice, we sent a debt validation letter to the collector, using a template we found on the cfpb (consumer financial protection bureau) website. The response from the collector did not make much sense to us. They essentially said "we need more information from you to provide the info you asked for. You also didn't provide any info to dispute the debt"....which is not what we were trying to do. Does this response mean they do not have the information to validate the debt? Or did the template we used not do what we expected? Is the next step to file a complaint with the cfpb as [this](https://www.consumerfinance.gov/ask-cfpb/what-information-does-a-debt-collector-have-to-give-me-about-the-debt-en-331/) page suggests, or do we just ignore this and go on our way? By the way, this isn't affecting her credit yet. **First two images are the validation letter we sent. The last image is their response:** https://imgur.com/a/EWyOVfO