Hi All, I’m here to both give a review and also ask a question. I’ve had lemonade insurance (wellness + accidental coverage) for about a year & 5 months now. At first, I really enjoyed it and didn’t have any issues with them, now I wouldn’t recommend if you have a pet that is known to get into incidents. I adopted my dog from a previous family who conveniently excluded his PICA issue. He is a 3 year old cavapoo who is notorious for taking anything he can get his hands on (socks, underwear, hygienic products, etc) and swallowing it. He’s had 2 surgeries (1 in March of 2024, and another in June of 2024). His first surgery was pre-policy and he was not insured with Lemonade. His second one I did receive reimbursement. We recently just went through another scare now in July 2025 (we have a behavior consult soon and take serious precautions, he is just VERY VERY sneaky) but thankfully, he was only hospitalized with fluids and passed the clothing in his stool, NO surgery was performed. Now, Lemonade is denying my claim to cover the costs of hospitalization due to “Foreign material ingestion being determined to be a Recurring Condition, which is not covered under this policy.” I reread my policy, and this is the exact language on it: “Conditions arising from a repetitive and specific activity that leads to decontamination (i.e., the induction of vomiting, stomach pumping, or treatment with charcoal), medical, or surgical treatment of your pet, if the same or a similar activity occurred two times within 18 months prior to the treatment date.” I’d like to add the claims specialist also got his medical records incorrect in her summary and argued that the decision was also based on the surgery that happened in March BEFORE my coverage took place. I got her on the phone and corrected her inaccuracies, but she is saying based on the recurrent conditions definition, those 2 incidents (March 2024 and June 2024) fall under the “18 months prior to treatment date.” From my understanding and the actual explicit language of the policy, how can the March 2024 surgery be considered if it predates coverage and there’s no legal language stating that pre-policy incidents are included?? Am I crazy or should I escalate this with DFS??, I am in NYC. Any lawyers’ thoughts welcomed!!