This year, my Farmers umbrella policy for 2 mil coverage premium increased from 1000/year to 3880/year. We are in California. Have umbrella/home/auto (2 cars, 2 drivers) with Farmers. My son is 22 and has an accident on his record from 2.5 years ago. He has his own car titled in his name. His car is insured on my policy. What would you do to lower the umbrella insurance cost? I am really struggling here. If he gets his own car insurance, can I be sued for an accident he causes since he is a dependent on my taxes? Thank you for any ideas.

Is it even legal for Healthy Paws pet insurance to increase premiums at almost 200% in CA? This is outrageously high!! Anyone experiencing the same? #healthypawspetinsurance

I pay into a CalSavers account. I received an email five days ago saying: "per my request all correspondence will be sent to:" \[an email which is not mine\]. It looks like a scammer domain. I don't remember registering to access the account on the CalSavers website, though I may have during the enrollment process when I started the job. Either way, I can't access the account as it doesn't recognize the email I would have used. Is it possible someone has stolen the money by transferring it out of my account? I don't imagine scammers would waste time as soon as they have access... I can't call CalSavers until their office opens tomorrow.

Can anyone give me tips on how my Ucare/DentaQuest can cover my teenagers braces because she has a very wide noticeable gap on her teeth from the fact that she was born with an extra tooth and had to get it removed and rarely smiles with her teeth anymore. She’s done 2 orthodontic evaluations for them and they keep denying her but she really does need them and that’s all she’s asking for her birthday this month but they keep telling me she needs a medical reason or doesn’t fit the certain conditions they approve but I can’t afford to pay them out of pocket.

I use Allstate, and currently have two cars on my policy, and am happy with my rate. I just traded one of the cars in for basically the same car, but the smaller version with fewer options (mostly luxuries, it has all the safety features). It is worth about $3,000 less than the car I traded in. When I called to make the change. They told me it will double my premium. No changes to any aspect of the policy, coverages, etc. A less valuable car. I cannot find a single reason my premium would increase at all, much less double. Anyone have any ideas? UPDATE: Thank you all for your input. I’ll never know the answer to what they were thinking because I immediately called another (well known, reputable) company and within 15 minutes had a new policy that’s 30% less than my ORIGINAL policy was. UPDATE 2: To the people who are digging in on “statistically it must just be more expensive to insure,” just…no. Aside from the obvious fact that no significant differences exist from one year to t

I was rear ended by a State Farm customer and they have accepted responsibility. I have been extremely nice until now but I am done. I asked about a rental car and told them it didn't have to be a big F150 like I drive and I could get by with something small because I work from home and don't go out much. They said great, go rent something and then file for reimbursement when I get my truck back. Since when am I responsible for renting the car and paying for it up front? They won't give me anything in writing that says they'll reimburse me for a specific daily amount or number of days. The letter says "reasonable cost" which is just way to vague. What's reasonable to me might not be reasonable to them. And I'm not, but what if I wasn't able to rent a car myself because I don't have a credit card or checking account. Side question - if I say I need a truck do they have to cover the cost of renting a truck?

Here is my scenario: My mother owns a car that she would like to have my daughter drive for school high school. The car had been parked and was on a non-op status, and the car insurance was canceled. The car has been re-registered and is ready to go once we have the insurance question settled. My mother does not drive anymore and did not renew her drivers license the last time it came up for renewal. We called the insurance company to reactivate her policy, Direct Insurance, and were told that she cannot get a policy because she does not have a valid drivers license. After doing some research, I think these are my options, and I want to get some feedback: 1. Find a company that will write a policy where the owner of the vehicle is not licensed. Does anyone know of a company that does this? 2. My mother has a living trust that many of her assets are in, but not her car. Would it make sense to transfer the car into the trust, or am I still faced with exact the same problem? The final solution is for me to simply buy my mother‘s car. We are both a little hesitant to do this because my brother also drives it on occasion and she wants to make sure that it is still available for him. If I purchased it, I would still make sure it is available to him, but now I would need to make sure that my brother was on the insurance as an occasional driver. I suspect this will end up being the simplest course of action, but I wanted to make sure that there wasn’t something else I am overlooking. TIA! Edit: the car would be insured in California.

Recently, my cat had to be rushed to the ER due to urinary blockage (FLUTD) , I submitted his bills, which rounded up to 7k, but the insurance denied it as pre-existing. * Pet had not prior diagnosis or sign of illness in the past with a clean record * Vet stated that he had issues peeing in an instance of stress due to construction and not due to FLUTD, and recommended Feliway Diffusers * Vet also wrote a letter for me specifying that the symptoms were not related to pre-existing FLUTD Now at the time that he started to show symptoms of blockage and straining the policy was already active and the waiting period was over. Am I crazy for thinking that them using past symptoms that were specified to not be related to deny my claim is actually wrong, and this emergency should fall under coverage?

Location: Georgia Two months ago, [I posted here](https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladvice/comments/1ikves7/frustrated_with_attorneys_lack_of_communication/) about my legal case, and I’m finally seeing some traction. However, as my attorney is preparing to file the statement of claim, I’m getting minimal explanation about his legal reasoning, and I’m concerned he may be rushing my case. Here’s where things stand: * My attorney initially filed for Magistrate Court, but after withdrawing that case in December (just days before the court date), he mentioned we should pursue Superior Court instead. * This past week, he drafted a second statement of claim. When I pressed him with questions about how the law applies to my case, his responses have been minimal, often just one or two sentences. * I believe my case, while complicated, does have grounds for pursuing punitive damages. However, the statement he drafted only outlines compensatory damages. * In my last email, I asked him to explain why punitive damages would not apply to my case. His response was simply, "I don't think it applies," with no further explanation. Additionally, he mentioned that Magistrate Court in Georgia is capped at $15,000, but earlier he had said he was planning to file in Superior Court. I’m assuming he plans to file next week. I’m planning to call ARAG Legal (through which I hired him) and consult with other attorneys for a second opinion. I’m feeling extremely frustrated and unsure **whether I should cut my losses or trust that his legal reasoning is sound** and proceed to move on with the case. **I would appreciate feedback on the strength of my claims, potential damages, and whether filing in Magistrate or Superior Court would be more appropriate for my case.** >**Case Information:** This case involves a breach of contract with elements of constructive eviction. >I was a tenant at an apartment complex from 2017 until December 2023. In March 2023, a new property management company took over the complex. In June 2023, I signed a new one-year lease under the new management. >Over the next eight months, I was improperly charged approximately $5,700 in various fees, including: >Late fees >Charges inconsistent with the lease terms >Early termination fees >I made several attempts to resolve the billing issues through documented communication (five emails), but the management did not correct the charges. >Due to ongoing safety concerns and unresolved billing issues, I chose to terminate my lease early in December 2023, sending certified letters to both the property and regional office. Unfortunately, the incorrect fees were eventually sent to collections, which negatively impacted my credit. >Safety Concerns / Constructive Eviction: Starting in June 2023, I reported multiple instances of loitering around my apartment, including one individual repeatedly sitting on my apartment steps and leaving trash. Despite repeated requests for increased security measures, no action was taken. >On October 31, 2023, a guest staying with me had their car stolen (police report filed). Residents living directly below me were implicated in the theft, and afterward, I experienced retaliatory behavior that made staying in the apartment unsafe. >

Location: South Texas Hello! I recently purchased my first home here in a coastal city in the state of Texas. As all of us on the gulf coast know, I am required by my mortgage lender to carry a windstorm policy for protection during hurricane season. This policy was set up by my home insurance company, and therein lies my issue. The home insurance company filed incorrect paperwork which inaccurately qualified my home for windstorm coverage and additionally inaccurately qualified my home for the mortgage company to lend to me. Can I (or the mortgage lender) file suit against the insurance company for this error? Edit: apologies for leaving out important context. The Texas windstorm agency has informed me that my policy will be discontinued in April if I do not provide the original paperwork for the property from 1988. (The paperwork was not completed in 88 despite insurance claiming it was) And if I cannot provide the paperwork I will be charged a 15% addendum to the premium in order to maintain my coverage.